Preview

Reports of the Laboratory of Ancient Technologies

Advanced search

Partition of Poland (1772-1795) and public opinion in post-reform Russia

https://doi.org/10.21285/2415-8739-2025-2-157-165

EDN: BWYKRV

Abstract

The paper analyses the discourse on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth division in the domestic socio-political thought of the post-reform Russian Empire. The research is based on the analysis of the 19th century periodicals, as well as the contemporaries’ memoirs. It is noted that Russian thinkers and publicists of post-reform Russia constantly turned to the origins of the Russian-Polish conflict, trying to find those responsible for its aggravation. At the same time, criticism of Poland partition was often divorced from historical realities and determined by a priori hostility to the government policy. In the second half of the 1860s - 1870s, Russian conservative and liberal journalists often pinned their hopes onto the integration of the Kingdom of Poland into the Russian Empire, similar to the unification of Scotland with England. By the early 1880s, even some conservatives beg an to look at the Kingdom of Poland as a “cut slice”. While journalists, especially of the Slavophile persuasion, were unstoppable in denouncing partition as allegedly a result of a “German conspiracy” which brought the insoluble “Polish question” to Russia, Ru ssian diplomatic circles expressed a completely different view: Catherine II, who achieved “natural borders” for Russia, was opposed to Alexander I, who annexed “ethnographic”, Catholic Poland to Russia, inaccessible for sustainable integration into the Russian E mpire. The author comes to the conclusion that Russian pre-revolutionary journalism was sensitive to the three partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The slogan of restoring “historical Poland”, put forward by almost all fractions of the Polish n ational movement, has become tragic for the inhabitants of this country. Maximalist calls for the return of Year 1772 borders precluded any compromise with any influential Russian political movement, even those sincerely sympathetic to the fraternal Slav ic nation. Of course, political romanticism can be admired for its heroism and sacrifice, but setting itself deliberate ly impossible goals, it can become a suicidal choice. This is exactly what happened with the Polish nationalists of the 19th century.

About the Author

L. Yu. Gusman
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Leonid Yu. Gusman, Dr. Sci. (History), Senior researcher, Institute of History

7-9, Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg 199034



References

1. Belousov M.S., Abdullaev Ya.S. ogly, Chikina V.A. (2019) Polish question in the discourse of Russian pre-revolutionary social thought. Nauchnyi dialog. No. 10. P. 328-346. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-328-346. EDN: APXQNR.

2. Bovua D. (2011) Gordiev knot of the Russian Empire: Power, nobility and people in Right-bank Ukraine (1793-1914): 1) Beauvois D. (2003) Pouvoir russe et noblesse polonaise en Ukraine: 1793-1830. Paris; 2) Beauvois D. (1985) Le noble, le serf et le revizor: la noblesse polonaise entre le tsarisme et les masses ukrainiennes, 1831-1863. Paris; 3) Beauvois D. (1983) La bataille de la terre en Ukraine, 1863-1914: les Polonais et les conflits socioethniques. Lille, 1993.) (Russ. ed.: Gordiev uzel Rossiiskoi imperii: Vlast', shlyakhta i narod na Pravoberezhnoi Ukraine (1793–1914). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1008 p.).

3. [Voskoboinikov N.N.] (1863) The Polish case. Library for reading. Vol. 177. P. 1-64. (In Russ).

4. Vul'pius R. (2023) The Birth of the Russian Empire: Concepts and practices of Political Domination in the XVIII century. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 711 p. (In Russ).

5. Golovin K.F. (1908) My memoirs. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. “Kolokol”. Vol. 1: (Before 1881 year). VIII. 396 p. (In Russ).

6. Gusman L.Yu. (2017) Essays on the History and Ideology of Russian Constitutionalism of the “Epoch of Great Reforms”. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Politechnic University. 190 p. (In Russ). EDN: ZUUOMD.

7. Dolbilov M.D. (2010) The Russian Land, a foreign Faith: The Ethno-confessional Policy of the Empire in Lithuania and Belarus under Alexander II. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1000 p. (In Russ). EDN: QPQMIR.

8. (2006) The western outskirts of the Russian Empire. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 608 p. (In Russ).

9. Kinyapina N.S. (2015) Selected works on the history of Russia in the 19th century : a collection of articles. Moscow: SEM. 448 p. (In Russ).

10. Kolyupanov N.P. (1883) An Essay on Internal Governance in Russia under Empress Catherine II. Russian Thought. Book. 2. February. P. 63-99. (In Russ).

11. Kotov A.E. (2020) The national question as covered in “Lithuanian diocesan bulletin” in 1860-1890 years. Notebooks on Conservatism. No. 1. P. 206-219. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24030/24092517-2020-0-1-206-219. EDN: FIMOLC.

12. Kudryavtseva R-E.A., Samylovskaya E.A. (2021) The image of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in Lithuanian public thought of the late XIX - first quarter of the XX centuries. Klio. No. 11 (179). P. 13-19. (In Russ). DOI: 10.51676/2070-9773_2021_11_13. EDN: FDRLIO.

13. Lukashova S.S., Lukashov N.V. (2018) The religious factor as a legal justification of the sections of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Genesis: Historical Research. No.10. P. 32-42. (In Russ). DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.10.27445. EDN: YPCIRV.

14. Lyashenko L.M. (2014) Alexander I: The autocratic Republican. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 344, [3] p. (In Russ).

15. Dvornichenko A.Yu. (2022) The Legacy of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Imperial Intellectual space: Collective monograph. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal'. 476 p. (In Russ). EDN: VMIKZH.

16. [Okreits S.S.] (1869) Journalism of 1869. Article II (Our historians are fiction writers). The case. Iss. 10. P. 1-35. (In Russ).

17. Pokrovskaya-Lamanskaya O.V. (1916) “Correspondence of two Slavophiles”. V.I. Lamansky - I.S. Aksakov. October 17, 1858. Russian Thought. Book 9. P. 1-32. (In Russ).

18. Puchenkov A.S. (2012) “To Warsaw!”: From the history of Polish-Soviet war of 1920. The Modern History of Russia. No. 2 (4). P. 24-40. (In Russ). EDN: PHLQLT.

19. Puchenkov A.S. (2016) The national policy of General Denikin. (Spring 1918 – spring 1920). Moscow: Nauchno-populyarnaya kniga. 399 p. (In Russ). EDN: LTFELJ.

20. Sazonov S.D. (2014) Memoirs. Moscow: Goryachaya liniya. 382 p. (In Russ).

21. Teslya A. (2020) Poles, Jesuits, Jews, and the “conspiracy myth”: the evolution of the “dangerous other” in Slavophilia. New Literary Review. No. 2 (162). P. 187-206. (In Russ). EDN: OWEPQW.

22. Kudryavtseva R.E.A., Samylovskaya E.A. (2022) Stages of the political and legal unification of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the crown of Poland in the “Course of Russian history” by E.F. Shmurlo. Voprosy Istorii. No. 3-1. С. 186–192. DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202203Statyi27. EDN: VUHMEX.


Review

Views: 26


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2415-8739 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1566 (Online)