Preview

Reports of the Laboratory of Ancient Technologies

Advanced search

«The content of the discussion of the current situation»: First Congress of Siberian Soviets (December, 3-9, 1925)

https://doi.org/10.21285/2415-8739-2024-1-161-170

EDN: UMXPOM

Abstract

The transcripts of the First Regional Congress of Soviets of Siberia, held in December 1925, are an important historical source. In 1993, they were prepared for publication and published under the editorship of I.A. Moletotov. This article is devoted to comparing the vision and assessments of economic prospects expressed at the regional, district and district levels of government in Siberia during the period of the New Economic Policy. Information from reference and statistical publications and collections of documents were taken into account during the preparation. A general assessment of the historiographical situation is given, it is emphasized that reasoned generalizations, different concepts and interpretations are presented in the historical literature. The general public of Russia retains a significant interest in the history of the NEP, expressed in the publication of works of a scientific and journalistic nature. Opening the work of the First Regional Congress of Soviets of Siberia, Chairman of the Sibrevkom M.M. Lashevich stressed that lasting peace had been established in the region, that Siberia had been mostly restored and was firmly following the socialist path. The composition of the delegates and the work of the congress are briefly described. It was very successful, the Regional Executive Committee (Sibkray Executive Committee) was elected, headed by G.H. Eikhe, consisting of 81 people, and 27 more became candidates. The Congress renamed Novonikolaevsk to Novosibirsk. For an example of authoritative approaches to agriculture, the documentation of the Tulun District Land Administration for 1926/1927 is given, containing both retrospective data and a detailed description of the prospects. It is concluded that the geographical features of the territory were taken into account in economic planning, and further rationalization of the agricultural sector was seen in the development of emerging economic trends. At this time, unlike the subsequent period of forced collectivization, it was hoped to motivate peasants to increase economic productivity mainly by market methods.

About the Authors

A. I. Baksheev
Professor V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Andrey I. Baksheev, Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences and Humanities,

1, Partizan Zheleznyak St., Krasnoyarsk 660022.



A. G. Rogachev
Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Alexander G. Rogachev, Dr. Sci (History), Professor of the Department of History and Political Science,

90, Mira Avenue, Krasnoyarsk 660049.



References

1. Baksheev A.I. (2013) Problems of Soviet statehood in Siberia during the NEP period. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirian Federal University. 345 p. (In Russ.). EDN: RWKGWR.

2. Baksheev A.I. (2020) NEP in Siberia. The atmosphere and the logic of war: monograph. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Medical University. 145 p. (In Russ.). EDN: YCGXCC.

3. Baksheev A.I. (2021) Bolshevik doctrine and agrarian production in Siberia (1921-1929): monograph. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Medical University. 288 p. (In Russ.). EDN: BOWJRY.

4. Verkhoturov D.N. (2017) Stalinist industrialization. Moscow: Veche. 462 p. (In Russ.).

5. Verkhoturov D.N. (2019) Stalinist collectivization. The struggle for bread. Moscow: Veche. 397 p. (In Russ.).

6. Vyborov M.M. (1965) Regulation of socio-economic relations in the Siberian village during the restoration period (based on the materials of the Irkutsk province). Sibir' v period stroitel'stva sotsializma i perekhoda k kommunizmu = Siberia during the construction of socialism and the transition to communism. Iss. 5. Krest'yanstvo i sel'skoe khozyaistvo Sibiri v 1917-1961 gg. = Peasantry and agriculture in Siberia. Novosibirsk. P. 39-58. (In Russ.).

7. Gimpel’son E.G. (2004) NEP. The New Economic Policy of Lenin-Stalin. Problems and lessons (20s XX century). Moscow: Sobranie. 303 p. (In Russ.).

8. Graziosi A. (2001) The Great Peasant War in the USSR. Bolsheviks and peasants. 1917-1933. (Russ. ed.: Velikaya krest'yanskaya voina v SSSR. Bol'sheviki i krest'yane. 1917–1933. Moscow: Rosspan, 2001. 95 p.).

9. Grishaev V.V. (1987) Communards of Siberia. Krasnoyarsk: Knizhnoe izdatel'stvo. 166 p. (In Russ.).

10. Davydov A.Yu. (2021) New Economic Policy: power, people, economy in post-revolutionary Russia (1921-1929). St. Petersburg: Eurasia. 320 p. (In Russ.). EDN: KSKOPH.

11. Zykov A.N. (1961) Irkutsk Communists in the struggle for the implementation of the Lenin cooperative plan (1921-1925). Irkutsk: Knizhnoe izdatel'stvo. 144 p. (In Russ.).

12. Il'inykh V.A. (1992) Commerce on the grain front (State regulation of the grain market in the conditions of the NEP. 1921-1927). Novosibirsk: Nauka. 224 p. (In Russ.). EDN: UAEKKZ.

13. Il'inykh V.A. (2005) State regulation of the Siberian agricultural market in the conditions of the NEP (1921-1928). Novosibirsk: SO RAN. 282 p. (In Russ.). EDN: TZUNKR.

14. Il'inykh V.A. (2015) Chayanov’s alternative (Perspective plan for the development of agriculture in Siberia in 1926). Proekty preobrazovaniya agrarnogo stroya Sibiri v XX v.: vybor putei i metodov modernizatsii = Projects for the transformation of the agrarian system of Siberia in the XX century: choosing ways and methods of modernization. Novosibirsk: Sibprint. P. 131-151. (In Russ.).

15. Mirkin Ya. (2020) NEP. Longing for a new one. Why are the lessons of the new economic policy of the Bolsheviks so relevant a century later. Rodina = Homeland. No. 1. P. 22-28. (In Russ.).

16. Potapov M.F. (1949) Irkutsk Bolsheviks in the campaign for the restoration of the economy: 1921-1925. Irkutsk: OGIZ. 168 p. (In Russ.).

17. Rogachev A.G. (2008) Alternatives to Russian modernization: the Siberian aspect (1917-1925-ies). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agricultural University. 171 p. (In Russ.). EDN: QPIBSB.

18. Rogachev A.G., Baksheev A.I. (2021)Features of the new economic policy (NEP) in "Sibrevkom Siberia" (1921–1925). Izvestiya laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii = Reports of the Laboratory of Ancient Technologies.Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 208-218. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21285/2415-8739-2021-2-208-218. EDN: HPHQLF.

19. Pavlyuchenkov S.A. (2002) NEP Russia. Moscow: Novyi khronograf. 468 p. (In Russ.). EDN: UFHEAD.

20. Sever’yanov M.D. (1991) NEP and modernity. Polemical notes. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University. 318 p. (In Russ.). EDN: YTSAEI.

21. Trifonov I.Ya. (1960) Essays on the history of the class struggle in the USSR during the NEP years (1921-1937). Moscow: Gospolitizdat. 279 p. (In Russ.).

22. Shanin T. (2020) The Awkward Class. Political Sociology of Peasantry in a Developing Society: Russia, 1910-1925. (Russ. ed.: Neudobnyi klass: politicheskaya sotsiologiya krest'yanstva v razvivayushchemsya obshchestve: Rossiya, 1910–1925. Moscow: Delo, 2020. 404 p.)


Review

Views: 46


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2415-8739 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1566 (Online)